Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1

To: Yann Leboulanger <asterix@lagaule.org>
Cc: 689147@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
From: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:37:15 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 85sj7cayx0.fsf@boum.org>
Reply-to: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, 689147@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <507AE9BB.6050701@lagaule.org> (Yann Leboulanger's message of "Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:35:07 +0200")
References: <20120929141255.27798.31708.reportbug@asterix.lagaule.org> <20121012093112.GN17465@radis.cristau.org> <507AE31D.8040808@lagaule.org> <20121014161802.GA3842@jwilk.net> <507AE9BB.6050701@lagaule.org>

Hi,

Yann Leboulanger wrote (14 Oct 2012 16:35:07 GMT) :
> On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.

> right, but we have a small change in it for logging:
> logger = logging.getLogger('gajim.c.gnupg')

Looks like this should be added to the embedded code copies list,
regardless of the minor diff:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
  - From: Yann Leboulanger <asterix@lagaule.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#688966: tagging 688966
Next by Date: Bug#690611: unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
Previous by thread: Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
Next by thread: Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread