On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 21:16:18 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > > > Please unblock package nwchem. This upload does not fix RC bugs, but it > > includes backported important fixes of the 6.1.1 point release (due to non-code > > changes like removal of documentation and updated testsuite files, the > > interdiff between 6.1 and 6.1.1 is huge, thus we have extracted the changes) > > > > Comparing the testuite runs Debian is doing between 6.1-3 and 6.1-4, > > test suite run tests/mcscf_ch2/mcscf_ch is now running OK, which > > produced non-converging gradients in a geometry optimization, see > > (i386): > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nwchem&arch=i386&ver=6.1-3&stamp=1333196687 > > Any update on this? It would be really nice to get those bugfixes into > wheezy. > The initial mail didn't make it to the list AFAICT. > If they are absolutely not possible to review, can we at least get the > patch in which fixes the outstanding testsuite failure (though note that > the Debian package only runs a tiny portion of the upstream testsuite to > be buildd-friendly) via t-p-u? Should we file a seperate bug for that > before uploading? > I haven't had time to look at the upstream changes, but from the 6.1-4 diff, at least the part about adding python stuff is a no-go as far as I'm concerned. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature