[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#694400: unblock: latex209/25.mar.1992-13



Dear release managers,

if there is anything I can do about the following unblock requests
please let me know.

THe package is now 10 days in unstable.

On Mo, 26 Nov 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Dear release managers,
> 
> as a follow up to the many emails that went around the RC bug #669382
> I have now uploaded a fix for it that is radical, but it is the way
> to go, IMNHO.
> 
> The problem with the mentioned bug was that mktexlsr was called in
> some unprotected ways. Normally packages use dh_installtex (from 
> tex-common) to auto-generate necessary maintainer script snippets.
> These packages are all fine.
> 
> latex209 packages (-base, -bin) were in a state since long with hand
> written maintainer scripts, probably long before dh_installtex was
> conceived, but properly handling these case is tiresome.
> Furthermore, also the format handling (latex format based on the
> shipped files) was hand written and did not conform to the standards
> set forth in tex-common.
> 
> After email contact with the current maintainer TSUCHIYA Masatoshi
> he agreed to hand over the package to the Debian TeX Group, and I have
> prepared a package that fixes this bug by the following actions:
> latex209 (25.mar.1992-13) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * Take over maintenance into the Debian TeX Group
>   * fix RC bug (Closes: #669382) (create files that are not removed) by:
>     - remove all maintainer scripts
>     - create the necessary code with dh_installtex
>     - add necessary build-dep on tex-common
>   * add latex209-bin.preinst to fix up old conffile so that debconf does
>     not ask unnecessary questions
> 
>  -- Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>  Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:50:17 +0900
> 
> 
> Let us look at the actual code (dropping trivialities like the
> control changes to maintainers etc). We have to deal with two
> things:
> 1* auto-generation of mktexlsr and format generation calls
> 2* take over old postinst-generated configuration files without
>    necessarily bothering the admin
> 
> 
> First of all we dropped
> 	postinst, postrm
> for both packages and changed the rules files to include the necessary
> calls to dh_installtex:
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules	2012-05-18 14:45:45.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
>  	rm -f build-stamp
>  	dh_clean
>  
> -build: build-stamp
> +build: build-arch build-indep
> +build-arch: build-stamp
> +build-indep: build-stamp
>  build-stamp:
>  	touch $@
>  
> @@ -46,6 +48,7 @@
>  	mv $(BASE)/splain.tex $(INI)
>  	mv $(BASE)/latex.ins $(DOC)
>  	cp -p readme.* $(DOC)
> +	dh_installtex
>  
>  install-bin: prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/latex209-bin/usr
>  install-bin: DH_OPTIONS=-platex209-bin
> @@ -55,6 +58,8 @@
>  	dh_testroot
>  	mkdir -p $(BIN)
>  	cd $(BIN) && ln -s tex latex209
> +	dh_installtex --priority=25 formatfile=debian/latex209.cnf \
> +		--flavor=format:no_links
>  
>  install-src: prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/latex209-src/usr
>  install-src: DH_OPTIONS=-platex209-src
> 
> 
> The second call links to the new file debian/latex209.cnf. THis file
> was previously generated in the postinst and removed/renamed in the
> prerm scripts of the latex209-bin packages.
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +#
> +# LaTeX 2.09
> +#
> +# format	engine		pattern-file	arguments
> +latex209	tex		-		latex209.ini
> +
> 
> 
> Finally, we added one preinst script that tries to carry over information
> from the old package to the new package without asking unnecessary
> questions to the user:
> 
> +#!/bin/sh -e
> +#
> +# latex209-bin preinst script
> +#
> +#
> +
> +# if the config file from previous versions is present and matches the
> +# md5sum, add the new dh_installtex header to make sure that no debconf
> +# questions are asked, otherwise just let the user decide.
> +#
> +
> +cnffile=/etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.cnf
> +bakfile=/etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.bak
> +correctmd=7c958ab4f8bf7a0080bc46c48d137bd1
> +
> +fix_it_up=0
> +
> +case "$1" in
> +  upgrade|install)
> +    old_version=$2
> +    if [ -n "$old_version" ] && dpkg --compare-versions "$old_version" lt 25.mar.1992-12.6 ; then
> +      if [ -r $cnffile ] ; then
> +        # if an old conffile is found and matches the md5 sum, we fix it up
> +        # otherwise we leave it alone
> +	oldmd=`md5sum $cnffile | sed -e 's/ .*//'`
> +        if [ "$oldmd" = $correctmd ] ; then
> +          fix_it_up=1
> +        fi
> +      elif [ -r $bakfile ] ; then
> +        # if the backup file is found, and matches the md5 sum, we simply delete
> +        # it, as it will be reinstatiated by dpkg
> +	oldmd=`md5sum $bakfile | sed -e 's/ .*//'`
> +        if [ "$oldmd" = $correctmd ] ; then
> +          rm $bakfile
> +        else
> +          mv $bakfile $cnffile
> +        fi
> +      fi
> +      
> +      if [ $fix_it_up = 1 ] ; then
> +        echo '# 25latex209.cnf
> +# You can change/add entries to this file and changes will be preserved
> +# over upgrades, even if you have removed the main package prior
> +# (not if you purged it). You should leave the following pseudo comment
> +# present in the file!
> +# -_- DebPkgProvidedMaps -_-
> +# 
> +#
> +# LaTeX 2.09
> +#
> +# format	engine		pattern-file	arguments
> +latex209	tex		-		latex209.ini
> +' > $cnffile
> +      fi
> +    fi
> +    ;;
> +esac
> +
> +#DEBHELPER#
> +
> +exit 0
> +
> +
> 
> 
> 
> This way we make sure that only if the admin has changed something in
> the configuration file he will get asked questions about upgrade.
> 
> -------------------
> 
> Although it is a rather bulky debdiff for a unblock, I still hope to
> get these changes as fixes for the above mentioned rc bug into testing.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your understanding, and don't hesitate to ask me
> if you have any further questions.
> 
> The full debdiff is attached.
> 
> Norbert
> 
> 
> 
> unblock latex209/25.mar.1992-13
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: wheezy/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 3.7.0-rc6+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/changelog latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/changelog
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/changelog	2012-05-18 15:08:59.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/changelog	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
> +latex209 (25.mar.1992-13) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> +  * Take over maintenance into the Debian TeX Group
> +  * fix RC bug (Closes: #669382) (create files that are not removed) by:
> +    - remove all maintainer scripts
> +    - create the necessary code with dh_installtex
> +    - add necessary build-dep on tex-common
> +  * add latex209-bin.preinst to fix up old conffile so that debconf does
> +    not ask unnecessary questions
> +
> + -- Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>  Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:50:17 +0900
> +
>  latex209 (25.mar.1992-12.5) unstable; urgency=low
>  
>    * Non-maintainer upload.
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/control latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/control
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/control	2012-05-15 15:25:27.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/control	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
>  Source: latex209
>  Section: tex
>  Priority: optional
> -Maintainer: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <tsuchiya@namazu.org>
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0)
> +Maintainer: Debian TeX maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0), tex-common (>= 3)
>  Standards-Version: 3.8.4
> -Uploaders: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
> +Uploaders: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>, Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
>  
>  Package: latex209-base
>  Architecture: all
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/copyright latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/copyright
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/copyright	2010-04-06 09:44:17.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/copyright	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>  This package was debianized by Nakahara Hayao <nakahara@mis.hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
>  for Debian JP Project on Sat, 29 Nov 1997 19:33:58 +0900.
>  
> -Currently maintained by TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <tsuchiya@namazu.org>, who
> -is sponsored by Masayuki Hatta <mhatta@debian.org>.
> +Currently maintained by the Debian TeX Maintainer,
> +former maintainer was TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <tsuchiya@namazu.org>.
>  
>  It was downloaded from ftp.riken.go.jp (one of CTAN sites).
>  URL is ftp://ftp.riken.go.jp/pub/tex-archive/obsolete/macros/latex209/distribs/latex209.tar
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postinst latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postinst
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postinst	2012-05-15 15:17:15.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postinst	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
> -#! /bin/sh
> -# postinst script for latex209-base
> -#
> -# see: dh_installdeb(1)
> -
> -set -e
> -
> -# summary of how this script can be called:
> -#        * <postinst> `configure' <most-recently-configured-version>
> -#        * <old-postinst> `abort-upgrade' <new version>
> -#        * <conflictor's-postinst> `abort-remove' `in-favour' <package>
> -#          <new-version>
> -#        * <deconfigured's-postinst> `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour'
> -#          <failed-install-package> <version> `removing'
> -#          <conflicting-package> <version>
> -# for details, see /usr/doc/packaging-manual/
> -#
> -# quoting from the policy:
> -#     Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the
> -#     post-installation script, and should be protected with a conditional
> -#     so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's
> -#     installation fails and the `postinst' is called with `abort-upgrade',
> -#     `abort-remove' or `abort-deconfigure'.
> -
> -TEXMF=/usr/share/texmf
> -
> -case "$1" in
> -    configure)
> -	mktexlsr $TEXMF
> -	;;
> -    abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
> -	;;
> -    *)
> -        echo "postinst called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
> -        exit 0
> -	;;
> -esac
> -
> -# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
> -# generated by other debhelper scripts.
> -
> -#DEBHELPER#
> -
> -exit 0
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postrm latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postrm
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postrm	2012-05-15 15:16:28.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-base.postrm	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
> -#! /bin/sh
> -# postrm script for latex209-base
> -#
> -# see: dh_installdeb(1)
> -
> -set -e
> -
> -# summary of how this script can be called:
> -#        * <postrm> `remove'
> -#        * <postrm> `purge'
> -#        * <old-postrm> `upgrade' <new-version>
> -#        * <new-postrm> `failed-upgrade' <old-version>
> -#        * <new-postrm> `abort-install'
> -#        * <new-postrm> `abort-install' <old-version>
> -#        * <new-postrm> `abort-upgrade' <old-version>
> -#        * <disappearer's-postrm> `disappear' <r>overwrit>r> <new-version>
> -# for details, see /usr/doc/packaging-manual/
> -
> -TEXMF=/usr/share/texmf
> -
> -case "$1" in
> -    remove|purge)
> -	if [ -x /usr/bin/mktexlsr ]; then
> -            mktexlsr $TEXMF
> -        fi
> -	;;
> -    upgrade|failed-upgrade|abort-install|abort-upgrade|disappear)
> -        ;;
> -    *)
> -        echo "postrm called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
> -        exit 0
> -esac
> -
> -# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
> -# generated by other debhelper scripts.
> -
> -#DEBHELPER#
> -
> -exit 0
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postinst latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postinst
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postinst	2010-04-07 20:51:51.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postinst	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
> -#! /bin/sh 
> -# postinst script for latex209-bin
> -#
> -# see: dh_installdeb(1)
> -
> -set -e
> -
> -# summary of how this script can be called:
> -#        * <postinst> `configure' <most-recently-configured-version>
> -#        * <old-postinst> `abort-upgrade' <new version>
> -#        * <conflictor's-postinst> `abort-remove' `in-favour' <package>
> -#          <new-version>
> -#        * <deconfigured's-postinst> `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour'
> -#          <failed-install-package> <version> `removing'
> -#          <conflicting-package> <version>
> -# for details, see /usr/doc/packaging-manual/
> -#
> -# quoting from the policy:
> -#     Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the
> -#     post-installation script, and should be protected with a conditional
> -#     so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's
> -#     installation fails and the `postinst' is called with `abort-upgrade',
> -#     `abort-remove' or `abort-deconfigure'.
> -
> -update_fmtutil()
> -{
> -    d=/etc/texmf/fmt.d
> -    f=${d}/25latex209.cnf
> -    b=${d}/25latex209.bak
> -    if [ ! -f ${f} ] ; then
> -	if [ -f ${b} ] ; then
> -	    echo "Preserved \`25latex209.bak' is found."
> -	    mv -f ${b} ${f}
> -	else
> -	    cat <<EOF >${f}
> -#
> -# LaTeX 2.09
> -#
> -# format	engine		pattern-file	arguments
> -latex209	tex		-		latex209.ini
> -
> -EOF
> -	fi
> -    fi
> -    update-fmtutil
> -}
> -
> -make_format()
> -{
> -    if [ -x /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys ]; then
> -	UTIL=fmtutil-sys
> -    else
> -	UTIL=fmtutil
> -    fi
> -    target=$1
> -    formats=/var/lib/texmf/web2c/tex
> -    echo "Make the format file of \`${target}'. This may take some time. ..."
> -    if ( ${UTIL} --byfmt ${target} ) ; then
> -	${MT_MKTEXUPD=`kpsewhich --format='web2c files' mktexupd`} \
> -	    ${formats} ${target}.fmt
> -	echo "The format file of \`${target}' is built successfully." 1>&2
> -    else
> -	echo "The format file of \`${target}' is NOT built successfully." 1>&2
> -	exit 1
> -    fi
> -}
> -
> -case "$1" in
> -    configure)
> -	update_fmtutil
> -	make_format latex209
> -	;;
> -    abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
> -	;;
> -    *)
> -        echo "postinst called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
> -        exit 0
> -	;;
> -esac
> -
> -# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
> -# generated by other debhelper scripts.
> -
> -#DEBHELPER#
> -
> -exit 0
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postrm latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postrm
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postrm	2010-04-06 10:50:14.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.postrm	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
> -#!/bin/sh
> -# postrm script for latex209-bin
> -#
> -# see: dh_installdeb(1)
> -
> -set -e
> -
> -# summary of how this script can be called:
> -#        * <postrm> `remove'
> -#        * <postrm> `purge'
> -#        * <old-postrm> `upgrade' <new-version>
> -#        * <new-postrm> `failed-upgrade' <old-version>
> -#        * <new-postrm> `abort-install'
> -#        * <new-postrm> `abort-install' <old-version>
> -#        * <new-postrm> `abort-upgrade' <old-version>
> -#        * <disappearer's-postrm> `disappear' <r>overwrit>r> <new-version>
> -# for details, see /usr/doc/packaging-manual/
> -
> -case "$1" in
> -    purge)
> -	rm -f /etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.cnf
> -	rm -f /etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.bak
> -	if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-fmtutil ]; then
> -            update-fmtutil
> -        fi
> -	;;
> -    remove)
> -	if [ -f /etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.cnf ] ; then
> -	    mv -f /etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.cnf /etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.bak
> -	fi
> -	if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-fmtutil ]; then
> -            update-fmtutil
> -        fi
> -	;;
> -    upgrade|failed-upgrade|abort-install|abort-upgrade|disappear)
> -        ;;
> -    *)
> -        echo "postrm called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
> -        exit 0
> -	;;
> -esac
> -
> -# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
> -# generated by other debhelper scripts.
> -
> -#DEBHELPER#
> -
> -exit 0
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.preinst latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.preinst
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.preinst	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.preinst	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +#!/bin/sh -e
> +#
> +# latex209-bin preinst script
> +#
> +#
> +
> +# if the config file from previous versions is present and matches the
> +# md5sum, add the new dh_installtex header to make sure that no debconf
> +# questions are asked, otherwise just let the user decide.
> +#
> +
> +cnffile=/etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.cnf
> +bakfile=/etc/texmf/fmt.d/25latex209.bak
> +correctmd=7c958ab4f8bf7a0080bc46c48d137bd1
> +
> +fix_it_up=0
> +
> +case "$1" in
> +  upgrade|install)
> +    old_version=$2
> +    if [ -n "$old_version" ] && dpkg --compare-versions "$old_version" lt 25.mar.1992-12.6 ; then
> +      if [ -r $cnffile ] ; then
> +        # if an old conffile is found and matches the md5 sum, we fix it up
> +        # otherwise we leave it alone
> +	oldmd=`md5sum $cnffile | sed -e 's/ .*//'`
> +        if [ "$oldmd" = $correctmd ] ; then
> +          fix_it_up=1
> +        fi
> +      elif [ -r $bakfile ] ; then
> +        # if the backup file is found, and matches the md5 sum, we simply delete
> +        # it, as it will be reinstatiated by dpkg
> +	oldmd=`md5sum $bakfile | sed -e 's/ .*//'`
> +        if [ "$oldmd" = $correctmd ] ; then
> +          rm $bakfile
> +        else
> +          mv $bakfile $cnffile
> +        fi
> +      fi
> +      
> +      if [ $fix_it_up = 1 ] ; then
> +        echo '# 25latex209.cnf
> +# You can change/add entries to this file and changes will be preserved
> +# over upgrades, even if you have removed the main package prior
> +# (not if you purged it). You should leave the following pseudo comment
> +# present in the file!
> +# -_- DebPkgProvidedMaps -_-
> +# 
> +#
> +# LaTeX 2.09
> +#
> +# format	engine		pattern-file	arguments
> +latex209	tex		-		latex209.ini
> +' > $cnffile
> +      fi
> +    fi
> +    ;;
> +esac
> +
> +#DEBHELPER#
> +
> +exit 0
> +
> +
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.prerm latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.prerm
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.prerm	2010-04-06 10:50:48.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209-bin.prerm	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
> -#!/bin/sh
> -# prerm script for latex209-bin
> -#
> -# see: dh_installdeb(1)
> -
> -set -e
> -
> -# summary of how this script can be called:
> -#        * <prerm> `remove'
> -#        * <old-prerm> `upgrade' <new-version>
> -#        * <new-prerm> `failed-upgrade' <old-version>
> -#        * <conflictor's-prerm> `remove' `in-favour' <package> <new-version>
> -#        * <deconfigured's-prerm> `deconfigure' `in-favour'
> -#          <package-being-installed> <version> `removing'
> -#          <conflicting-package> <version>
> -# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/
> -
> -case "$1" in
> -    remove|upgrade|deconfigure)
> -	rm -f /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex209.fmt
> -	rm -f /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex209.log
> -	if [ -x /usr/bin/mktexlsr ]; then
> -            mktexlsr
> -        fi
> -	;;
> -    failed-upgrade)
> -        ;;
> -    *)
> -        echo "prerm called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
> -        exit 0
> -	;;
> -esac
> -
> -# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
> -# generated by other debhelper scripts.
> -
> -#DEBHELPER#
> -
> -exit 0
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/latex209.cnf	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +#
> +# LaTeX 2.09
> +#
> +# format	engine		pattern-file	arguments
> +latex209	tex		-		latex209.ini
> +
> diff -Nru latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules
> --- latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules	2012-05-18 14:45:45.000000000 +0900
> +++ latex209-25.mar.1992/debian/rules	2012-11-13 14:52:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
>  	rm -f build-stamp
>  	dh_clean
>  
> -build: build-stamp
> +build: build-arch build-indep
> +build-arch: build-stamp
> +build-indep: build-stamp
>  build-stamp:
>  	touch $@
>  
> @@ -46,6 +48,7 @@
>  	mv $(BASE)/splain.tex $(INI)
>  	mv $(BASE)/latex.ins $(DOC)
>  	cp -p readme.* $(DOC)
> +	dh_installtex
>  
>  install-bin: prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/latex209-bin/usr
>  install-bin: DH_OPTIONS=-platex209-bin
> @@ -55,6 +58,8 @@
>  	dh_testroot
>  	mkdir -p $(BIN)
>  	cd $(BIN) && ln -s tex latex209
> +	dh_installtex --priority=25 formatfile=debian/latex209.cnf \
> +		--flavor=format:no_links
>  
>  install-src: prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/latex209-src/usr
>  install-src: DH_OPTIONS=-platex209-src


Best wishes

Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining            preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOYLAKE (n.)
The pool of edible gravy which surrounds an inedible and disgusting
lump of meat - eaten to give the impression that the person is 'just
not very hungry, but mmm this is delicious'. Cf. Peaslake - a similar
experience had by vegetarians.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff


Reply to: