Bug#695065: marked as done (RM: sigit/0.3.2-2)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:23:00 +0000
with message-id <1354569780.23754.2.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695065: RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695065,
regarding RM: sigit/0.3.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
695065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
sigit is a low-popcon package (18 installations) which was last updated
upstream in 2006 and in Debian in 2007.
http://bugs.debian.org/673369 is a message to the maintainer without
reply since 2012-05-18.
The package FTBFS with multiarch locations (#641573) and is broken at
least on amd64 (#694976).
I briefly looked into fixing the issues at hand but then gave up when I
noticed that this is a hopelessly overengineered tool (IMO) with ≈ 5000
SLOC for rotating signatures…
I hereby request removal of sigit from testing.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armel
i386
Kernel: Linux 3.5.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 18:37 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> sigit is a low-popcon package (18 installations) which was last updated
> upstream in 2006 and in Debian in 2007.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/673369 is a message to the maintainer without
> reply since 2012-05-18.
>
> The package FTBFS with multiarch locations (#641573) and is broken at
> least on amd64 (#694976).
>
> I briefly looked into fixing the issues at hand but then gave up when I
> noticed that this is a hopelessly overengineered tool (IMO) with ≈ 5000
> SLOC for rotating signatures…
Removal hint added.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: