[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#690458: marked as done (RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing)

Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:10:40 +0100
with message-id <20121202121040.GM5634@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #690458,
regarding RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug
#638339).  It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but
it cannot now be released in wheezy.  Therefore please remove
from testing only.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Dec  2, 2012 at 10:47:15 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:31:26 +0000, Alan Woodland wrote:
> 
> > On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Hi Alan,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
> > >
> > >> There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
> > >> the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package
> > >> should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the
> > >> future in my view.
> > >>
> > > Any progress here?
> > I have prepared an upload, which drops the no longer functional -dkms
> > package and removes the recommends, but I'm still debating the merits
> > of adding a conflicts with the older versions of the -dkms package.
> > 
> It would be nice to have that in ASAP; I don't think a conflict would be
> needed, but don't mind much either way…
> 
Thanks for the 0.8.4-3 upload.  Unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: