[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1



On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 18:06:53 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:

> On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> >
> >>Package: release.debian.org
> >>Severity: normal
> >>User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> >>Usertags: unblock
> >>
> >>Please unblock package gajim
> >>
> >>A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0]
> >>More information can be found in the Mail I sent to debian-release mailing
> >>list: [1]
> >>debdif is available here: [2]
> >>
> >>[0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682598
> >>[1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/09/msg00042.html
> >>[2]: http://lagaule.org/debian/gajim/gajim-0.15.1.debdiff
> >>
> >>unblock gajim/0.15.1-1
> >>
> >A few comments:
> >- the source format change is not appropriate
> 
> It's because it was in format 3.0 previously (Gajim 0.14.4), and for
> 0.15 I did something wrong that I wanted to repair. Moreover, I need
> to add a patch for your next point (change to _StreamCB) and it's
> nicer  in format 3.0. If you really want, I can re-do the patch in
> old format.
> 
Yes please.

> >- why does this drop the 0.15-1.1 changelog entry?
> 
> hmm I didn't do this upload so it was not in my debian files. I've
> re-added it.
> 
Thanks.

> >- what does the src/common/check_X509.py change do?  string comparison
> >   and version comparison are kind of different things...
> 
> Gajim 0.15 badly checks openssl version. see
> https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/7124
> 
Well it's not fixed as far as I can tell, just differently wrong.
Probably doesn't matter too much either way for the debian package, but
still...

> >- how is the change to _StreamCB supposed to work?  there doesn't seem
> >   to be an 'obj' variable in that function
> 
> It does not work. Oauth2 is not in 0.15 branch, so not usefull. But
> ok, I've added a patch to remove that.
> 
Thanks.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: