On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 17:21:32 +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package quota > http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html > > The new version fixes Debian bug #685356, namely: > > repquota: Fix reporting for XFS > > Conversion to generic quota scanning introduced a bug for XFS where we > stopped scanning after quotactl reported first error. quotactl for XFS > however reports ENOENT when it has nothing to report for a particular user > / group and we shouldn't stop scanning after that. We tried to test for > this but the test was wrong. Fix it. > The changelog diff is weird: --- quota-4.00/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:05.000000000 +0000 +++ quota-4.01/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:06.000000000 +0000 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -quota (4.00-4) unstable; urgency=low +quota (4.01-1) unstable; urgency=low - * Added upstream patch to fix problem with editing of several users. - (Closes: #670641) - * Updated packages description which was pretty outdated. - Thanks to Justin B Rye <jbr@edlug.org.uk> (Closes: #673396) + * Imported Upstream version 4.01 (Closes: #685356) + * Adjusted patch for new upstream version. + * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no changes needed. + * Use Debian build flags. - -- Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org> Wed, 23 May 2012 18:35:45 +0200 + -- Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org> Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:51:40 +0200 quota (4.00-3) unstable; urgency=low What's up with that? Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the whole new release? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature