[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#694578: unblock (pre-approval): okular/4.8.4-3



Hi,

Alle mercoledì 28 novembre 2012, Niels Thykier ha scritto:
> On 2012-11-28 01:04, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > 
> > Please (pre-approve) unblock package okular
> > einclude/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
> > 
> > This packages solves:
> > 
> > - #680946, severity important, avoiding different versions of
> > libokularcore and okular at the same time. The first 3 entries in
> > the changelog are part of this fix.
> > 
> > Three commits backported from upstream to solve:
> > 
> > - the extraction of the page bounding box, used by the trimming
> > function; - restore word detection in DVI documents;
> > - avoid a crash with broken fonts.
> > 
> > Diffstat:
> >  changelog                                                         
> >           |   22 + control                                        
> >                              |    3
> >  patches/avoid_crash_with_broken_fonts.diff                       
> >            |   31 ++ patches/fix_word_detection_with_dvi_docs.diff
> >                                |  153 ++++++++++ patches/series   
> >                                                            |    3
> >  patches/upstream_Call-Generator-signalPixmapRequestDone-_after_-s
> >  avin.patch |   40 ++ 6 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 1
> >  deletion(-)
> > 
> > Kinds regards, Lisandro.
> > 
> > unblock okular/4.8.4-3
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please go ahead.  Let us know when it has been rebuilt on all
> (relevant) architectures and has some time in unstable.

Thanks, it has been uploaded.

Unfortunately, I recompiled it using a wrong pbuilder chroot (which has 
poppler/experimental) -- can you please binNMU okular/amd64?

Sorry for the trouble, and thanks again,
-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: