On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 22:43:42 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:07:46 +0100, > Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> a écrit : > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 21:12:09 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > > > > Le Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:56:11 +0200, > > > Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > why is the last bit needed? > > > > > > > > I didn't get a reply to the above (why you need adduser nut nut). > > See #493159 > > This is to fix a situation were the user nut was not created without > being added to the group. Is that correct Arnaud? > Well that bug is marked as fixed in 2.2.2-7, which is way before squeeze. I suppose it can stay, it just seems useless. > > > > > > + if [ -d /var/run/nut ] ; then > > > > + chown root:nut /var/run/nut > > > > + chmod 770 /var/run/nut > > > > + fi > > > > > > > > why does the nut user need write access there? And why is this > > > > created in postinst instead of an init script? > > > > > > nut should be able to create sockets in that directory. > > > > > > This is probably a bit redundant as this is also done in the > > > initscript. > > > > > Then I'd prefer to not have it in postinst. > > Well this was a copy/paste of the nut-server postinstall script, so > this should also be removed from that file too. Do you want me to do > that for wheezy? Please. > The maintainer scripts should probably reworked a bit, > but that will be for later I guess. > Certainly not for right now indeed :) Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature