[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#693818: marked as done (unblock: auctex/11.86-11)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:54:39 +0100
with message-id <50B0995F.9030501@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#693818: unblock: auctex/11.86-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #693818,
regarding unblock: auctex/11.86-11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
693818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693818
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package auctex allowing in 11.86-11, uploaded to unstable
today.

11.86-11 fixes:
  - #675752 and #686366: these bugs stem from a misunderstanding of mine
    about how the postinst is passed parameters when triggered as well
    as from a code error of mine about how bash expands words in
    variable substitution; they really should be fixed, and the fix is
    small and understandable.  They particularly affect installations
    with more than one GNU Emacs flavor installed; while wheezy only
    sports emacs23, AFAIK quite a few GNU Emacs users also install
    emacs-snapshot.
  - #681481: wheezy sports TeX Live 2012, which introduced a new
    filesystem layout; auctex trigger declaration of interest has to be
    updated accordingly.
  - #657761: auctex version 11.86-10.1, now in testing, already supports
    emacs-snapshot; unfortunately the support is half-broken due to a
    missing Depends alternative: users of the auctex package are not
    allowed to uninstall emacs23 in favor of emacs-snapshot.

11.86-11 also:
  - acknowledges Christian Perrier l10n 11.86-10.1 NMU;
  - fixes copyright and initial translation attribution in the two po
    files touched by 11.86-10.1 (with no translation wording changes).

The debdiff against the package in testing is attached.

unblock auctex/11.86-11

-- 
Thanks, Davide

Attachment: auctex.debdiff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2012-11-20 18:28, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package auctex allowing in 11.86-11, uploaded to unstable
> today.
> 
> 11.86-11 fixes:
>   - #675752 and #686366: these bugs stem from a misunderstanding of mine
>     about how the postinst is passed parameters when triggered as well
>     as from a code error of mine about how bash expands words in
>     variable substitution; they really should be fixed, and the fix is
>     small and understandable.  They particularly affect installations
>     with more than one GNU Emacs flavor installed; while wheezy only
>     sports emacs23, AFAIK quite a few GNU Emacs users also install
>     emacs-snapshot.
>   - #681481: wheezy sports TeX Live 2012, which introduced a new
>     filesystem layout; auctex trigger declaration of interest has to be
>     updated accordingly.
>   - #657761: auctex version 11.86-10.1, now in testing, already supports
>     emacs-snapshot; unfortunately the support is half-broken due to a
>     missing Depends alternative: users of the auctex package are not
>     allowed to uninstall emacs23 in favor of emacs-snapshot.
> 
> 11.86-11 also:
>   - acknowledges Christian Perrier l10n 11.86-10.1 NMU;
>   - fixes copyright and initial translation attribution in the two po
>     files touched by 11.86-10.1 (with no translation wording changes).
> 
> The debdiff against the package in testing is attached.
> 
> unblock auctex/11.86-11
> 

Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: