Re: Pre approval request for chrony (for Wheezy)

[Joachim Wiedorn <ad_debian@joonet.de>]

Hello Adam,

Adam D. Barratt wrote on 2012-11-21 11:53:

> Ugh, what a mess.
> 
> The two RC bugs you mention are merged, so closing one will by 
> definition close the other. However, they appear to refer to different 
> issues, so I'm not sure why they're merged in the first place.

Both RC bugs concern a kernel 3.x problem, but technically they concern
two different problems. I would be logical to unmerge these RC bugs. I
want to do this before my upload.

> If #642209 and #691340 are the same bug, they should *be* the same bug 
> (i.e. merged). As it is, the earlier bug will still be marked as 
> outstanding in testing after the above upload, whereas the newer RC bug 
> is still marked as applying to unstable, which it logically cannot. 
> #628919 claims to be fixed in testing already, due to the unversioned 
> -done.

You are right, that's a mess. I will try to "repair" the flags of these
bugs.

> Please feel free to go ahead with the upload, and file an unblock bug 
> afterwards. The state of the bugs against chrony will need fixing up, 
> however, as above.

Thank you. So I will do the next steps.

---
Have a nice day.

Joachim (Germany)