[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#691814: Bug #691814: Re: unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-1



Control: retitle -1 unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-3

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:49:56PM +0800, GUO Yixuan wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 05:36 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 13:57 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> >> This upload updates document for gcc 4.4 branch, removes
> >> gcc-doc-base (provided by gcc-4.7-doc) and gcj-4.4-doc (gcj-4.4
> >> already removed from wheezy). The packaging style was updated to
> >> match gcc-4.6-doc/gcc-4.7-doc.
> > 
> > Given that we're in a freeze (and have been for some time now) packaging
> > style changes aren't really appropriate. In particular, debhelper compat
> > bumps (even from 5 to 7) and source format / patch system changes aren't
> > things I'd expect to see in a package with an unblock requested.
> > 
> > (gcc-4.{6,7}-doc didn't have previous versions in testing so the use of
> > 3.0 (quilt) etc wasn't a change.)
> 
> OK, I'll try to go back to the old 1.0 formant with dh level 5 and
> dpatch and upload again.

I just uploaded a new -3 version, with packaging style changes reverted.

> > 
> >> I attached result of
> >>
> >> $ git diff debian/4.4.4.nf1-1 debian/4.4.7-1 -M
> >>
> >> It's large because this package hasn't seen an update for long...
> > 
> > As a result the mail did not make it to the debian-release list.
> 
> Well, apart from changes in debian/, changes in upstream part compressed
> to over 60k... certainly more than the 40k limit. (I suppose the
> canonical place for unblock request is the bts, so it doesn't matter too
> much to be absent from debian-release, does it?)

As the debdiff is still over 40k, I'm not attaching it this time,
instead, please checkout the debdiff on vasks[1]. (just to make
sure it can reach debian-release.)

[1] http://vasks.debian.org/~yixuan-guest/debdiff-4.4.4.nf1-1-and-4.4.7-3.gz

unblock gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-3

Regards,

GUO Yixuan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: