Bug#693228: marked as done (RM: knot/1.0.6-1)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:55:58 +0000
with message-id <1352904958.27968.151.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#693228: RM: knot/1.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #693228,
regarding RM: knot/1.0.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
693228: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693228
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
while my heart bleeds, since I am also an upstream for this package,
I am requesting a removal of Knot DNS from testing, because 1.0.x
branch is not stable enough to be kept in next stable Debian and it's
too late (and too many upstream changes away) to pull 1.1.x branch
from unstable, which we would be the reasonable thing to do if the
freeze was not in effect.
Thank you,
Ondrej
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 14:35 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> while my heart bleeds, since I am also an upstream for this package,
> I am requesting a removal of Knot DNS from testing, because 1.0.x
> branch is not stable enough to be kept in next stable Debian and it's
> too late (and too many upstream changes away) to pull 1.1.x branch
> from unstable, which we would be the reasonable thing to do if the
> freeze was not in effect.
Removal hint added.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: