[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#692172: marked as done (unblock: nvidia-graphics-modules/304.48+2)



Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:03:04 +0000
with message-id <1351933384.4348.3.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#692172: unblock: nvidia-graphics-modules/304.48+2
has caused the Debian Bug report #692172,
regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-modules/304.48+2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
692172: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692172
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-modules

This is a rebuild for kernel abi 4 which renames the module
packages accordingly.

Ideally this should migrate together with the kernel.


Thanks.

Andreas


unblock nvidia-graphics-modules/304.48+2
diff -Nru nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/changelog nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/changelog
--- nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/changelog	2012-09-13 10:42:24.000000000 +0200
+++ nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/changelog	2012-09-26 09:57:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+nvidia-graphics-modules (304.48+2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Build for kernel 3.2.0-4.
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann <debian@abeckmann.de>  Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:56:16 +0200
+
 nvidia-graphics-modules (304.48+1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Use nvidia-kernel-source 304.48.
diff -Nru nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/control nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/control
--- nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/control	2012-09-13 10:42:24.000000000 +0200
+++ nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/control	2012-09-26 09:57:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  Andreas Beckmann <debian@abeckmann.de>,
 DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8),
- linux-headers-3.2.0-3-amd64 [i386 amd64], linux-headers-3.2.0-3-486 [i386], linux-headers-3.2.0-3-686-pae [i386],
+ linux-headers-3.2.0-4-amd64 [i386 amd64], linux-headers-3.2.0-4-486 [i386], linux-headers-3.2.0-4-686-pae [i386],
  nvidia-kernel-source (>= 304.48), nvidia-kernel-source (<< 304.48.0~),
 Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 Homepage: http://www.nvidia.com/
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 Package: nvidia-kernel-amd64
 Architecture: i386 amd64
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-3-amd64 (>= 304.48)
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-4-amd64 (>= 304.48)
 Breaks: nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64 (<< 295)
 Replaces: nvidia-kernel-2.6-amd64 (<< 295)
 Description: NVIDIA kernel module for Linux (amd64 flavor)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
  the NVIDIA kernel module for Linux (amd64 flavor).
  It can be savely removed.
 
-Package: nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-3-amd64
+Package: nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-4-amd64
 Architecture: i386 amd64
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module (amd64 flavor)
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 
 Package: nvidia-kernel-486
 Architecture: i386
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-3-486 (>= 304.48)
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-4-486 (>= 304.48)
 Breaks: nvidia-kernel-2.6-486 (<< 295)
 Replaces: nvidia-kernel-2.6-486 (<< 295)
 Description: NVIDIA kernel module for Linux (486 flavor)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
  the NVIDIA kernel module for Linux (486 flavor).
  It can be savely removed.
 
-Package: nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-3-486
+Package: nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-4-486
 Architecture: i386
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module (486 flavor)
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 
 Package: nvidia-kernel-686-pae
 Architecture: i386
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-3-686-pae (>= 304.48)
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-4-686-pae (>= 304.48)
 Breaks: nvidia-kernel-2.6-686-pae (<< 295)
 Replaces: nvidia-kernel-2.6-686-pae (<< 295)
 Description: NVIDIA kernel module for Linux (686-pae flavor)
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
  the NVIDIA kernel module for Linux (686-pae flavor).
  It can be savely removed.
 
-Package: nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-3-686-pae
+Package: nvidia-kernel-3.2.0-4-686-pae
 Architecture: i386
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}
 Description: NVIDIA binary kernel module (686-pae flavor)
diff -Nru nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/control.md5sum nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/control.md5sum
--- nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/control.md5sum	2012-09-13 10:42:24.000000000 +0200
+++ nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/control.md5sum	2012-09-26 09:57:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-c799468ab3a6fec7196f1ce557726ae9  debian/control
+bb9a6c9d5aaf5a9dbe41e48322b45b06  debian/control
 d1d71a255d2fc8e281b325feb948db80  debian/control.source
 8dce140a73e725f1cd59a7aef8ecc83d  debian/control.flavor
 737e968161571039c186e1855b948ef6  debian/rules
-46196ba81a6c71fedbb11cb73e054869  debian/rules.defs
+f55dbcf51f647cd76be27c83effbc5ca  debian/rules.defs
 #UPSTREAM_VERSION=304.48#
diff -Nru nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/rules.defs nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/rules.defs
--- nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+1/debian/rules.defs	2012-09-13 10:42:24.000000000 +0200
+++ nvidia-graphics-modules-304.48+2/debian/rules.defs	2012-09-26 09:57:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 SOURCE_MIN_REV		 =
 NVIDIA_LEGACY		 =
-KERNEL_VERSION		 = 3.2.0-3
+KERNEL_VERSION		 = 3.2.0-4
 
 DEFAULT			 = yes
 RT			 = no

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 01:09 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-modules
> 
> This is a rebuild for kernel abi 4 which renames the module
> packages accordingly.

Unblocked last night, whilst looking at:

> Ideally this should migrate together with the kernel.

as in fact it _must_ migrate together with the kernel - well, or be
removed; I assumed you'd prefer the migration though. ;-)

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: