[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#691372: marked as done (unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.10)



Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:46:15 +0200
with message-id <50892687.3030300@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#691372: unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.10
has caused the Debian Bug report #691372,
regarding unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.10
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691372
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package common-lisp-controller

This is a translation-only update that should go into wheezy

unblock common-lisp-controller/7.10

Regards

    Christoph

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: mipsel (mips64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-loongson-2f
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2012-10-24 22:49, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package common-lisp-controller
> 
> This is a translation-only update that should go into wheezy
> 
> unblock common-lisp-controller/7.10
> 
> Regards
> 
>     Christoph
> 
> [...]

Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: