[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4



Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Please unblock package openvrml.
> I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4.
> 
> - Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9 . (Closes: #674489)

Specifically, _remove_ multiarch support. Might it have made sense to
move the files to openvrml-doc instead?

> - Enable hardening  and fix FTBFS with -Werror=format-security option.
> - Change dh_clean to dh_prep in install target. (Closes: #683482)
> - Fix FTBFS on mips.

Why do the binary packages have a manually maintained architecture list
in any case? If the intent is to have the package only build on Linux
architectures, then specifying "linux-any" would be more maintainable
than a hand-crafted list that includes unofficial artchitectures such as
alpha, hppa, avr32, sh4 and m68k but is missing s390x. Alternatively,
they should simply be "any".

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: