Bug#690357: marked as done (unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52)
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:34:19 +0100
with message-id <30e50ed778fd1b63c8df254889e73035@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690357: unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52
has caused the Debian Bug report #690357,
regarding unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690357: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package hddtemp
This version fixes #680877 that interrupts installation of Xfce
systems from scratch with an unnecessary debconf question.
Even though this is not a release critical bug per se, the fix is very
simple and the impact of the bug is quite wide (for instance, as the
said debconf question is less translated than D-I, it brings
untranslated material in the middle of fully localized installs).
unblock hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13.10.2012 08:26, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please unblock package hddtemp
This version fixes #680877 that interrupts installation of Xfce
systems from scratch with an unnecessary debconf question.
Even though this is not a release critical bug per se, the fix is
very
simple and the impact of the bug is quite wide (for instance, as the
said debconf question is less translated than D-I, it brings
untranslated material in the middle of fully localized installs).
It also includes an undocumented change to debian/rules to use
dpkg-buildflags. :-(
Meh; unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: