Hi Norbert, On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 09:03:29 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Cyril, > > On Do, 23 Aug 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > 319 files changed, 37796 insertions(+), 31727 deletions(-) > > :-( > > > Other team members might have a different opinion, but it looks to me > > like those changes are very much too important for me/us to consider > > reviewing/unblocking at this point, sorry. > > I see your point. > > In this case is there anything you would suggest? I could backort > the changes that fixes the encoding issues to the version in testing, > but that would need introduction of epochs (something I dislike). > > If I go this way, I want to make sure that it will be accepted > into testing, otherwise I end up with useless introduction of > epochs for nothing. THe idea would be to just apply the patch > I sent you (from -1 to -3) plus one small one in the configure > that relaxes the check for some library component (also upstream). > > Anyother ideas, suggestions? > It's not clear to me why you're saying an epoch would be necessary. The fix you sent could be applied to the version in testing and uploaded there directly. If you could prepare that upload and send us a final debdiff that would be great. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature