Your message dated Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:12:57 +0200 with message-id <50743EF9.3080802@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690052: nmu: genometools_1.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #690052, regarding nmu: genometools_1.4.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690052 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: genometools_1.4.2-2
- From: Andreas Beckmann <debian@abeckmann.de>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:40:16 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20121009144016.10117.82176.reportbug@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu genometools_1.4.2-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean Debian sid environment." genometools/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) libgenometools0/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) Looks like a package built on Ubuntu was uploaded to Debian ... @Sascha (and your sponsor): in the future, please build the packages you are uploading to Debian in a sid chroot. pbuilder/cowbuilder may be a handy tools for this ... Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Sascha Steinbiss <steinbiss@zbh.uni-hamburg.de>, 690052-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Andreas Beckmann <debian@abeckmann.de>
- Subject: Re: Bug#690052: nmu: genometools_1.4.2-2
- From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:12:57 +0200
- Message-id: <50743EF9.3080802@dogguy.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 50743C2C.8000607@zbh.uni-hamburg.de>
- References: <[🔎] 20121009144016.10117.82176.reportbug@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de> <[🔎] 50743C2C.8000607@zbh.uni-hamburg.de>
On 09/10/2012 17:01, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > On 10/09/2012 04:40 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> genometools/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) >> libgenometools0/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) >> >> Looks like a package built on Ubuntu was uploaded to Debian ... >> @Sascha (and your sponsor): in the future, please build the packages you >> are uploading to Debian in a sid chroot. pbuilder/cowbuilder may be a >> handy tools for this ... > > Hi Andreas, thanks for the hint. I have actually noticed this earlier > today and did exactly as you suggested, i.e. built a new package using > pbuilder in a clean sid environment. This relaxed the libc dependency to >> =2.11, which looks more reasonable. > > Sorry for the inconvenience -- I will check more carefully next time. > I can confirm that -4 doesn't have the reported issue. $ grep-archive -f sid:ALL: -XP genometools Package: genometools Architecture: amd64 Depends: libbz2-1.0, libc6 (>= 2.11), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4), libexpat1 (>= 2.0.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), liblua5.1-0, libncurses5 (>= 5.5-5~), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.22.0), libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.5.9), libtinfo5, lua-filesystem, lua-lpeg, lua-md5, zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.3.3), genometools-common Priority: extra Version: 1.4.2-4 $ grep-archive -f sid:ALL: -XP libgenometools0 Package: libgenometools0 Architecture: amd64 Depends: libbz2-1.0, libc6 (>= 2.11), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4), libexpat1 (>= 2.0.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), liblua5.1-0, libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.22.0), libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.5.9), lua-filesystem, lua-lpeg, lua-md5, zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.3.3), genometools-common Priority: extra Source: genometools Version: 1.4.2-4 I'm closing this bugreport now. Thanks to Andreas for spotting this! Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--- End Message ---