On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:03:01PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Regarding the emacs23 | emacs24 dependency I thought emacs24 would enter > testing. Obviously it did not make it in time. And the patch I submitted > was for acl2, not gcl. Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing > package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen? Why build depend on emacs24 given that emacsen satisfies it if you install it locally? Our build infrastructure would not pick emacs24 with your proposal anyway because build depends after the first one are discarded. Your local build would also not pick it up because emacs23 is still in unstable. > Additionally, it looks like emacs24 is not the default for unstable, > why not? It should be for testing yes, but unstable? To avoid shoveling more stuff towards t-p-u without testing. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature