[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#689752: marked as done (unblock tiff3-3.9.6-9 and tiff-4.0.2-4)



Your message dated Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:39:07 +0200
with message-id <5070185B.1040508@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689752: unblock tiff3-3.9.6-9 and tiff-4.0.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #689752,
regarding unblock tiff3-3.9.6-9 and tiff-4.0.2-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689752: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock tiff3-3.9.6-9 and tiff-4.0.2-4, which fix CVE-2012-4447
and address RC security bug #688944.

I had uploaded tiff3-3.9.6-8 and tiff-4.0.2-3, which fixed CVE-2012-4447
but claimed to fix non-existent CVE-2012-4777.  Ugh.  My dcut was a few
seconds too late.  So those versions only lived a few minutes.  The bug
was only reported against the tiff package but affects both tiff and
tiff3.

-- 
Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2012-10-05 23:43, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock tiff3-3.9.6-9 and tiff-4.0.2-4, which fix CVE-2012-4447
> and address RC security bug #688944.
> 
> I had uploaded tiff3-3.9.6-8 and tiff-4.0.2-3, which fixed CVE-2012-4447
> but claimed to fix non-existent CVE-2012-4777.  Ugh.  My dcut was a few
> seconds too late.  So those versions only lived a few minutes.  The bug
> was only reported against the tiff package but affects both tiff and
> tiff3.
> 

Unblocked both, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: