[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#681110: marked as done (unblock: sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:46:11 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] 20121005074611.GZ31434@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Request unblock sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #681110,
regarding unblock: sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
681110: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681110
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

I would like to ask an unblock to sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3

There's an unblock already for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-2 because it was in
unstable before the freeze, but -2 failed to build in kfreebsd-i386
and thus it never migrated to testing:

  https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=sdl-stretch&arch=kfreebsd-i386

I produced -3 and asked the package to be removed from
"Packages-arch-specific" (see #680275) so it would build in
kfreebsd-amd64 and amd64 [1], but we were asked to restrict the
architectures ourselves first (any-amd64 any-386) in a new
revision/upload of the package before granting the removal.

The package doesn't have rdepends, so this unblock shoudln't cause much impact:

  $ apt-cache rdepends libsdl-stretch-dev
  libsdl-stretch-dev
  Reverse Depends:

[no output, no rdepdends]

  $ apt-cache rdepends libsdl-stretch-0-3
  libsdl-stretch-0-3
  Reverse Depends:
    libsdl-stretch-dev

Cheers.


[1] The restriction to i386 comes from 2005 (see URL below); upstream
was subsequently updated to support amd64 as well but not updated
until recently, when new blood in SDL team took over.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/sdl-stretch/current/changelog#version0.2.3-4



unblock sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Oct  4, 2012 at 01:36:15 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:

> For the record: I just added an unblock hint for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3. 

Closing the corresponding bug.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: