[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#682697: marked as done (Unblock sumo/0.15.0~dfsg-3)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Oct 2012 17:50:37 +0200
with message-id <20121003155037.GP31434@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682697: Unblock sumo/0.15.0~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #682697,
regarding Unblock sumo/0.15.0~dfsg-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
682697: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package sumo_0.15.0~dfsg-3.
The upload applies hardening of buildflags, remove from compilation
embedded copy of gl2ps and uses packaged version instead.

Diff is attached.

unblock sumo/0.15.0~dfsg-3

Thanks.

Anton

Attachment: sumo.diff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 13:37:47 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@gmail.com> (24/07/2012):
> > Please unblock package sumo_0.15.0~dfsg-3.
> > The upload applies hardening of buildflags
> 
> see Adam's and my comments on that topic in another thread.
> 
> > remove from compilation embedded copy of gl2ps and uses packaged version
> > instead.
> 
> At this point, I think I'd buy that patch without the one about build flags.
> 
That doesn't seem to be happening, closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: