[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#689117: unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+3



On 01/10/2012 10:11, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Olivier Bonvalet<debian.list@daevel.fr>  writes:

Also, since ads are often the main funding source of a website, I
think blocking ads is a «politic» choice which can't be the default
behavior.

You are right, this is a political choice. I don’t think Debian should
endorse the web being run by advertisements when there are technical
solutions.


The default behavior should be to display the website as it is. Then
if a user choose to don't display ads then it's fine, he also accept
the fact that the website can disable access to some of it contents.

If that argument would be followed, we'd need flash, java and who knows
what else enabled in the default browser. I don't think that would be
smart or even desirable.

It's what we do by recommanding browser-plugin-gnash in the gnome package no ? flashplugin-nonfree is not installed by default, only because of licence problems, not because "flash is evil".




Quite a number of ads need flash anyway, and those that do not, usually
raise privacy concerns - so we either allow ads and hurt the privacy of
our users, or we protect their privacy by default at the cost of not
displaying ads.

Then we should also disable Google safe-browsing, and enable Tor on default setup ?

The "Do-Not-Track" feature should already "protect" their privacy, right ?



I don't know about you, but I'd go with the second anyday.


I totally agree that we should help users to protect their privacy. But I don't agree on the fact that Debian decide to transparently cut access to part of the web, without any notification.

Of course each user can disable that, but I really think user should decide to enable that himself.


Reply to: