On 26.09.2012 16:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of > interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering > whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed? > > I haven't heard yet of plans to port d-i to gtk3, and that wouldn't > happen during the wheezy release cycle anyway, so removing that > block-udeb would spare some questions/brain cycles on the -boot/-release > side when considering unblock{,-udeb}'s. Don't you think? Makes sense, imo. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature