On 26.09.2012 16:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of
> interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering
> whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed?
>
> I haven't heard yet of plans to port d-i to gtk3, and that wouldn't
> happen during the wheezy release cycle anyway, so removing that
> block-udeb would spare some questions/brain cycles on the -boot/-release
> side when considering unblock{,-udeb}'s. Don't you think?
Makes sense, imo.
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature