Hi Julien
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 07:26:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 21:54:53 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > Hi Cyril
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:48:28AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson <ojsbug@gmail.com> (01/06/2012):
> > > > netcdf is causing FTBS for packages that rely on
> > > > /usr/include/netcdf.mod because they use gfortran-4.7 but the mod file
> > > > is built against gfortran-4.6.
> > >
> > > we're trying to get that switch reverted, so binNMUing your package
> > > might not be needed.
> > >
> > > > nmu netcdf_1:4.1.3-6 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against gfortran-4.7, see #671965"
> > >
> > > That's incorrect anyway, the switch only happened on *{amd64,i386}.
> >
> > [I'm not the maintainer of this package but looking at currently open
> > RC bugs for wheezy.]
> >
> > Am I correct, that as now we have (definitively) gcc defaults to 4.7
> > for amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd66 and kfreebsd-i386 a binNMU can be done?
> >
> > nmu netcdf_1:4.1.3-6 . amd64,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Rebuild against gfortran-4.7, see #671965"
> >
> Scheduled. Note that architecture names need to be space separated.
Thanks a lot! Will keep that in mind if I need to ask again in future
a binmu!
Regards,
Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature