Bug#683831: marked as done (unblock: aplus-fsf/4.22.1-5)
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:04:44 +0200
with message-id <5040A85C.3050907@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683831: unblock: aplus-fsf/4.22.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683831,
regarding unblock: aplus-fsf/4.22.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
683831: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683831
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aplus-fsf
The dependency on xemacs21-nomule was blocking it; I removed that dependency. The full set of binary packages is: aplus-fsf, aplus-fsf-doc, aplus-fsf-el, aplus-fsf-dev and xfonts-kapl.
unblock aplus-fsf/4.22.1-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2012-08-31 13:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-08-04 17:18, Neil Roeth wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package aplus-fsf
>>
>> The dependency on xemacs21-nomule was blocking it; I removed that dependency. The full set of binary packages is: aplus-fsf, aplus-fsf-doc, aplus-fsf-el, aplus-fsf-dev and xfonts-kapl.
>>
>> unblock aplus-fsf/4.22.1-5
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>
> I am sorry, but I think we will have to decline this request. Per
> Freeze Policy Rule 8[1], the limit is 20 days and your request seems to
> have missed by a week.
>
> Sorry,
> ~Niels
>
> [1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
>
>
Sorry for the double mail, forgot to close the bug.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: