2012/8/17 David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>: > Hi, > > Le 16/08/2012 17:56, Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > >> Please unblock package dhelp > >>> I now see that 0.6.21 never entered testing > > There has been some changed strings in this version, and no call for > translation has been performed. Thanks in advance for taking care of it, > especially if this version 0.6.21 enters Wheezy. It should just be a > matter of running: > > podebconf-report-po --podir=. --utf8 --notdebconf --call > > Of course, the Last-Translator field in PO files should first be fixed > since Georgios M. Zarkadas <gz@member.fsf.org> put his name there for no > good reason. I can handle this call for translation in a timely manner > in case the release team may consider this unblock request. > > Regards > > David > > P.-S.: I missed the debdiff in your request ;-) > > Hi, Last-Translator was changed because I have translated some of the new strings in the po files and though it was the right thing to do. Anyway, now that I see the full picture it makes sense to revert it. I have uploaded a new version of dhelp (0.6.22) in mentors.debian.net, http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.6.22.dsc that: 1) Reverts the field change in po files (except the .el one, where I am the translator). 2) Fixes also bug #679691 (severity: Important) diagnosed by piuparts on 0.6.21. I attach the deb diffs of 0.6.22 vs 0.6.21, as well as 0.6.22 vs 0.6.21+nmu1 and 0.6.21+nmu1 vs 0.6.21. The change in the maintainer scripts between 0.6.21+nmu1 and 0.6.22 is not actually as big as it shows in the diff, because the functions shown inside the postrm are just copied from the existing in 0.6.21+nmu1 debian/scripts files without any change. Basically, the "$1 in purge)" logic is transferred from the prerm (where it is not executed, hence the bug #679691) to the postrm, as is. I could also run the podebconf-report-po command myself, but I don't know if first the new version should be uploaded in unstable, so I wait on advise for it. Please tell me if anything else is needed from my part. regards George Zarkadas
Attachment:
dhelp-0.6.22_vs_0.6.21.diff
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
dhelp-0.6.22_vs_0.6.21+nmu1.diff
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
dhelp-0.6.21+nmu1_vs_0.6.21.diff
Description: Binary data