[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#685835: marked as done (tpu: racket/racket_5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+deb7u1)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:16:29 +0100
with message-id <5255dea79878fb830ad805d14a6e0a3d@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685835: tpu: racket/racket_5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+wheezy1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685835,
regarding tpu: racket/racket_5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685835: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

I recently uploaded a new upstream version of racket, completely
forgetting that I meant to do a minor upload to fix #680685 (racket and
planet-venus both ship a planet binary) first.  The unstable upload does
fix that bug, but the delta between the versions is far too large to ask
for an unblock.

In case it's worth fixing that for Wheezy, I have a package I can
upload to testing.  Attached is the debdiff.

What do you think?

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>

diffstat for racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2 racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2

 NEWS      |    9 +++++++++
 changelog |    6 ++++++
 rules     |    1 +
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff -Nru racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog
--- racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog	2012-06-26 19:07:18.000000000 -0400
+++ racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/changelog	2012-08-22 21:52:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+racket (5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+wheezy1) testing; urgency=low
+
+  * Stop shipping /usr/bin/planet.  (Closes: #680685)
+
+ -- James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>  Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:49:27 -0400
+
 racket (5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Update description to use Racket in place of scheme (Closes: #679000).
diff -Nru racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS
--- racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS	1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
+++ racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/NEWS	2012-08-22 21:52:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+racket (5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2-2+wheezy1) testing; urgency=low
+
+  The planet binary is no longer provided with racket.  Uses of it should be
+  replaced with “raco planet”.
+
+  This removal is planned upstream as well, but it is being performed earlier
+  in Debian's packaging due to #680685.
+
+ -- James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>  Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:34:33 -0400
diff -Nru racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules
--- racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules	2012-06-26 19:07:18.000000000 -0400
+++ racket-5.2.1+g6~92c8784+dfsg2/debian/rules	2012-08-22 21:52:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 do-install-arch: PLT_EXTRA=--no-docs --no-zo
 do-install-arch:
 	$(DEB_MAKE_ENVVARS) $(MAKE) -C $(DEB_BUILDDIR) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
+	rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/bin/planet
 
 do-install-indep: PLT_EXTRA=--no-launcher --no-install --no-post-install
 do-install-indep:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 26.08.2012 17:09, James McCoy wrote:

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:18:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org> (25/08/2012):
> > On a related note, it looks to me like racket isn't exactly a
> > widespread package, so picking up xz compression too for t-p-u
> > wouldn't help with fitting more stuff on 1st/2nd CDs, would it?
>
> EPARSE. Are you suggesting I should add the xz compression changes to > the t-p-u upload, too? Looking at cdimage-search.d.o, racket's down 
> in the 30s for the CD it's on.
ESENDINGMAILSAT4AM. I meant to ask whether first CDs would benefit from having racket xz-compressed. Given your answer, clearly not, so sticking 
to the proposed fix only for your t-p-u upload looks sufficient.


Ok, uploaded.


Approved; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: