Hello Salvatore, release team, Salvatore Bonaccorso [2012-08-22 18:24 +0200]: > The debdiff unfortunately is not only related to #682631, but am I > correct that all changes there should be in wheezy? 2.35-1 fixes two bugs which are not really release critical, but I wouldn't mind having the fixes in wheezy as they are a bit of a nuisance in certain scenarios (when building packages under C locales). 2.34-1 should not be affected by #682631, as this was accidentally introduced by the fixes in 2.35. But now that the test suite is fixed to run for 2.6 as well, I'm fairly confident that 2.36-1 is regression free compared to 2.34. > 10 day testing period is over, but are you going to ask for an unblock > for python-distutils-extra? I wasn't going to initially, but I wouldn't mind to see 2.36 in wheezy for the corner cases that 2.35 fixes, as well as the added stability from the test suite fixes. > The fix would be needed to fix the FTBFS for linaro-image-tools and > nautilus-image-manipulator in wheezy. Hm, then it seems I'm wrong -- what is the FTBFS when building these two in wheezy, with p-d-e 2.34? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature