Bug#683739: marked as done (unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-5)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:23:29 +0100
with message-id <1345573409.6830.4.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683739: unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683739,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
683739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kfreebsd-9
It fixes a Policy violation (#672255) and a bug in linprocfs (#682291 / #681594)
which is holding off fix for an RC bug in another package (haxe FTBFS,
see #621890).
An ABI bump was triggered by the second fix.
kfreebsd-9 (9.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove /boot symlink kludge. (Closes: #672255)
* fix_VOP_VPTOCNP_bypass_for_nullfs.diff: Fix /proc/self/exe in
nullfs. (Closes: #682291, #681594)
-- Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:07:17 +0200
unblock kfreebsd-9/9.0-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 03.08.2012 14:10, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Please unblock package kfreebsd-9
>
> For the record, this is currently on hold at least until d-i beta 1 is
> out, as all udeb-producing packages are frozen for that.
We're currently between betas, so things are a little more fluid.
> > It fixes a Policy violation (#672255) and a bug in linprocfs (#682291
> > / #681594)
> > which is holding off fix for an RC bug in another package (haxe
> > FTBFS,
> > see #621890).
> >
> > An ABI bump was triggered by the second fix.
>
> haxe isn't in wheezy; a request to change that has already been denied.
>
> Given all of the above, we should consider whether this should wait
> until after the release.
As a couple of people pointed out to me, once wheezy is released we'll
need to be able to build jessie's haxe on buildds running wheezy's
kernel.
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: