[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#685211: marked as done (unblock: postgresql-9.1/9.1.5-1)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:15:28 +0200
with message-id <20120819111528.GI32199@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685211: unblock: postgresql-9.1/9.1.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685211,
regarding unblock: postgresql-9.1/9.1.5-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685211: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685211
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello release team,

yesterday, PostgreSQL announced new security/bug fix microreleases:

  http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1407/

I uploaded 9.1.5 into unstable with priority "medium":

  http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/postgresql-9.1/news/20120817T223635Z.html

The package successfully passes the upstream as well as the
postgresql-common integration tests and built fine on most
architectures except of mipsel where it is still needs-build.

There are no packaging changes except debian/changelog. Do you want an
unfiltered/filtered upstream diff, etc?

Thank you for considering!

Martin

unblock postgresql-9.1/9.1.5-1

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org> (19/08/2012):
> It's the same kind of update that we have put in -security/-updates
> for stable releases for several years. However, if you want to bump
> the baking time to 10 days, that's fine for me.

Then it's settled, unblocked, age-days to 10. Of course if some other
release team member wants it to happen earlier, that can be adjusted.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: