Hi, and sorry for the lag. Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au> (08/08/2012): > On 08/08/12 00:24, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I think I won't be against having 1.8.4 in unstable, and see what > > happens on the bug reports front after an extended period of time > > (say 20 days). It would have been nice to see it uploaded in the meanwhile… > 20 days is fine - we've already had some feedback on 1.8.4 and now > there is a 1.8.5 release > > Would you be happy to accept 1.8.5 on the same terms? > > I attach a debdiff and SVN log output (1.8.4 vs. 1.8.5) Anyway, please upload 1.8.5 to unstable ASAP, we'll see in a month or so what happened. > Agreed - that is how most of the fixes came into 1.8.5 - e.g. one user > found that the --help output was crashing the program > > None of these issues are strictly release critical - but they are all > fixes that provide a better experience of the package. The diff is indeed large for a --help crasher fix… > > No promise on our (possibly) unblocking this package after the said > > period of time. > > Understood - do I need to put Closes: #681387 in the changelog for > upload? Nope, this isn't a bug report against your package anyway. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature