[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#640499: hardening, too



Hi Adam,

Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> (18/08/2012):
> I just got bit by the lack of multiarch here (wine is broken on amd64
> if nvidia is involved), and wrote a multiarchification patch before
> realizing there's already one here.  It's redundant, except for one
> bit: since an upload is needed anyway

given the intrusiveness of that patch [libxvmc/multiarch], I'm pretty
sure it's going to be considered too late in the release cycle. I'm
also pretty sure that we (release team) said that already for similar
packages.

[cc: release team for other opinions.]

> you could just as well add the hardening flags (another release goal).
> It's a trivial change, but "git am" is still faster than doing that
> yourself...

Thanks, but please note that requesting unrelated features in a given
bug report isn't too nice.

BTW, you call it trivial but you lost -Wall…

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: