On 13.08.2012 00:41, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
The bug corrected by this version is correctable only by re-building as you are writing. However, since 7.4.11 or more debhelper were required for this,I updated debhelper to 9. Since Standards-Version was old, it updated.
The issue is that in order to accept the changes, a reviewer needs to satisfy themselves (at least I'd want to) that the old and new rules files are equivalent. That's often not a trivial thing to do when a custom rules file has been converted to short-form dh.
Probably, the renewal of debhelper and Standards-Version will be unnecessary.
They /are/ unnecessary.
However, I think that the problem of #682051 is required as PackagesQuality of ReleaseGoal. Is the package which deleted unnecessary updating accepted?
You mean a package which is a no-changes source upload of the previous package? That would certainly be acceptable, yes.
Regards, Adam