[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#684763: pu: package tor/0.2.2.38-1



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

currently tor 0.2.2.37-1~squeeze+1 is in proposed-updates as discussed in
#679224.

Upstream has released a new security only update, 0.2.2.38 today:


| Changes in version 0.2.2.38 - 2012-08-12
|   Tor 0.2.2.38 fixes a rare race condition that can crash exit relays;
|   fixes a remotely triggerable crash bug; and fixes a timing attack that
|   could in theory leak path information.
| 
|   o Security fixes:
|     - Avoid read-from-freed-memory and double-free bugs that could occur
|       when a DNS request fails while launching it. Fixes bug 6480;
|       bugfix on 0.2.0.1-alpha.
|     - Avoid an uninitialized memory read when reading a vote or consensus
|       document that has an unrecognized flavor name. This read could
|       lead to a remote crash bug. Fixes bug 6530; bugfix on 0.2.2.6-alpha.
|     - Try to leak less information about what relays a client is
|       choosing to a side-channel attacker. Previously, a Tor client would
|       stop iterating through the list of available relays as soon as it
|       had chosen one, thus finishing a little earlier when it picked
|       a router earlier in the list. If an attacker can recover this
|       timing information (nontrivial but not proven to be impossible),
|       they could learn some coarse-grained information about which relays
|       a client was picking (middle nodes in particular are likelier to
|       be affected than exits). The timing attack might be mitigated by
|       other factors (see bug 6537 for some discussion), but it's best
|       not to take chances. Fixes bug 6537; bugfix on 0.0.8rc1.

[ https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/release-0.2.2:/ReleaseNotes ]


I would like to package this new version as 0.2.2.38-1, and upload it to
squeeze so that we can get these issues fixed in Debian.

May I proceed?

Thanks,
weasel


Reply to: