Your message dated Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:20:50 +0200 with message-id <20120809232050.GC12535@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#684397: unblock: bzip2/1.0.6-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #684397, regarding unblock: bzip2/1.0.6-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 684397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Cc: anibal@debian.org
- Subject: unblock: bzip2/1.0.6-4
- From: Santiago <santiago@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:32:58 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120809133258.GA2280@nomada>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Team, Please, unblock bzip2/1.0.6-4 bzip2 1.0.6-4 includes hardening buildflags (one of the release goals) for libbz2.so that were missing in 1.0.6-3. It was a small change and the package has been for 10 days in unstable without problems. So, please let this new revision move into testing. Attached is a diff between both versions. unblock bzip2/1.0.6-4 Thanks for your work! Santiago -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_CO.utf8, LC_CTYPE=es_CO.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dashdiff -Nru bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog --- bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog 2012-06-08 01:50:12.000000000 +0200 +++ bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog 2012-07-27 16:16:03.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +bzip2 (1.0.6-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Updating 30-bzip2-harden.patch, hardening LDFLAGS was missing for + libbz2.so. Thanks to Simon Ruderich. Closes: #655164 + + -- Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiago@debian.org> Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:14:34 +0200 + bzip2 (1.0.6-3) unstable; urgency=low * Bumped bzip2 priority from optional to standard. Closes: #642657 diff -Nru bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/30-bzip2-harden.patch bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/30-bzip2-harden.patch --- bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/30-bzip2-harden.patch 2012-06-04 13:31:16.000000000 +0200 +++ bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/30-bzip2-harden.patch 2012-07-27 10:51:16.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile -index 9754ddf..3169741 100644 ---- a/Makefile -+++ b/Makefile -@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ SHELL=/bin/sh +Index: bzip2-1.0.6/Makefile +=================================================================== +--- bzip2-1.0.6.orig/Makefile 2012-07-01 15:05:07.000000000 +0200 ++++ bzip2-1.0.6/Makefile 2012-07-01 15:08:45.586377822 +0200 +@@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ CC=gcc AR=ar RANLIB=ranlib @@ -15,3 +15,12 @@ # Where you want it installed when you do 'make install' PREFIX=/usr/local +@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ + ln -sf $^ $@ + + libbz2.so.$(sominor): $(OBJS:%.o=%.sho) +- $(CC) -o libbz2.so.$(sominor) -shared \ ++ $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o libbz2.so.$(sominor) -shared \ + -Wl,-soname,libbz2.so.$(somajor) $^ -lc + + %.sho: %.c
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Santiago <santiago@debian.org>, 684397-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#684397: unblock: bzip2/1.0.6-4
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:20:50 +0200
- Message-id: <20120809232050.GC12535@mraw.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120809133258.GA2280@nomada>
- References: <[🔎] 20120809133258.GA2280@nomada>
Hi, Santiago <santiago@debian.org> (09/08/2012): > bzip2 1.0.6-4 includes hardening buildflags (one of the release goals) > for libbz2.so that were missing in 1.0.6-3. It was a small change and > the package has been for 10 days in unstable without problems. So, > please let this new revision move into testing. > > Attached is a diff between both versions. > > unblock bzip2/1.0.6-4 done, but set age-days to 15, just in case some late bug report arrives. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---