Bug#682460: unblock: boost1.50/1.50.0-1

["Steve M. Robbins" <steve@sumost.ca>]

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:34:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 20:26:36 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> 
> > Yes, it's a judgement call, I'd agree.  My thinking is that (a) it's
> > already building on all architectures (low risk) and (b) has somewhat
> > better support for GCC 4.7 and (c) it's Boost :-)
> > 
> Could providing updated boost packages in wheezy-backports be a possible
> alternative?

Sure: it is a possible alternative.  To be honest, however: it's not
something that I will do.


Regards,
-Steve