On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 21:15:37 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 07/30/2012 08:08 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have migrated in time, > >> 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 fixes the FTBFS of the dkms module. > >> > > See the existing requests for clarification of the changes. > > i don't understand what you're talking about. let me repeat: > > 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have migrated in time, > 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 fixes the ftbfs for good. > > you only need to look at the diff of 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3. > I don't care that 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 "would have migrated", since it didn't. I'm looking at the diff between testing and sid. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature