Hi Steve, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 20:26:36 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Yes, it's a judgement call, I'd agree. My thinking is that (a) it's > already building on all architectures (low risk) and (b) has somewhat > better support for GCC 4.7 and (c) it's Boost :-) > Could providing updated boost packages in wheezy-backports be a possible alternative? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature