* Betr.: " Re: Bug#681196: unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3" (Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:15:41 +0200): > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:11:14 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > > > Please unblock package tryton-proteus. The -3 upload fixes the #680817 > > FTBFS, revealed by a Lucas-powered rebuild. > > > Does #680817 affect the version in testing? The BTS doesn't think so, > and looking at the changes in proteus/pyson.py and setup.py I guess not. > > Now on to the changes themselves: > > --- tryton-proteus-2.2.1/debian/compat 2011-12-26 12:35:55.000000000 +0000 > +++ tryton-proteus-2.2.2/debian/compat 2012-07-11 09:31:06.000000000 +0000 > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -8 > +9 > > This is not ok during freeze. > > --- tryton-proteus-2.2.1/debian/rules 2011-12-26 12:35:55.000000000 +0000 > +++ tryton-proteus-2.2.2/debian/rules 2012-07-11 09:31:06.000000000 +0000 > @@ -7,3 +7,6 @@ > dh_auto_clean > > rm -rf *.egg-info > + > +override_dh_builddeb: > + dh_builddeb -- -Zxz -z9 > > neither is this, really. > > So with no RC or important bug fix that I know of in this version, I'm > afraid I'm going to have to say no, sorry. > > Cheers, > Julien I now can see, what has happened. tryton-proteus_2.2.2-2 was uploaded and accepted into unstable on 2012-06-30, but didn't make it into testing so far because of a version mismatch [1]. This should be due to a missing upload of 2.2.1-1 on Wed May 9, that I wasn't aware of. Could you please mark 2.2.2-2 for acceptance in testing, because it is a legitimate version uploaded before the freeze? The fix for #680817 is a really simple non-invasive fix and there should be no problem to accept it with 2.2.2-4, once 2.2.2-2 is in testing. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tryton-proteus/news/20120630T165055Z.html Thanks, Mathias
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature