On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 21:42:40 +0300, Boris Pek wrote: > Dear release team, > > I ask for a freeze exception for qpxtool version 0.7.1.002-6. > > I have prepared few QA uploads. But unfortunately not all of them were > sponsored before freeze [1]. > > This update of the package does not fix any RC bug, but it fixes important > and wishlist bugs. Also the quality of package was improved in common. > > File in attachment was produced using command: > > $ debdiff qpxtool_0.7.1.002-5.dsc qpxtool_0.7.1.002-6.dsc > qpxtool_0.7.1.002-5:0.7.1.002-6.diff > > It would be nice to see this updated package in Wheezy. > > Best regards, > Boris > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?include=subject%3A[QA];package=sponsorship-requests > diff -Nru qpxtool-0.7.1.002/debian/changelog qpxtool-0.7.1.002/debian/changelog > --- qpxtool-0.7.1.002/debian/changelog 2011-06-21 14:04:14.000000000 +0300 > +++ qpxtool-0.7.1.002/debian/changelog 2012-06-26 03:13:59.000000000 +0300 > @@ -1,3 +1,24 @@ > +qpxtool (0.7.1.002-6) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * QA upload. > + * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2). > + * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 7.0.50~); updated debian/compat. This is not ok. > + * Added file debian/patches/05-add-hardening-flags-in-compiler-options.patch. > + * Updated debian/rules: added hardening flags in compiler options. > + * Changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev. > + Added file debian/patches/04-fix-build-with-libpng15.patch. > + Added small hack in debian/rules (see LIBPNG_VER variable). > + Build with libpng version 1.5.10 was tested successfully. > + (Closes: #662481, #648127) The hack is unneeded, -lpng should work fine AFAIK. > + * Used [kfreebsd-any] instead of hardcoded list of kFreeBSD architectures > + [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] in build dependency. (Closes: #634714) > + * File debian/copyright was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0. > + * Fixed such lintian warnings and notes: > + - out-of-date-copyright-format-uri > + - hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-fortify-functions > + > + -- Boris Pek <tehnick-8@mail.ru> Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:11:10 +0300 > + So I don't think I would accept this, sorry. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature