On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:39:17PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > Then it turned out there were some arch-specific FTBS problems that I > managed to track down, with help, during DebConf. So now I wanted to > see if you thought that emacs24 might still be appropriate for Wheezy, > or if it just needs to be withdrawn. So far I think that it will be -backports material, sorry. It only got introduced into the archive on 6/30, has not received that much testing and people might assume that everything else in the archive works with it. Which doesn't seem to be necessarily the case given some recent mails. Is emacs23 in good shape for the release? Kind regards Philipp Kern PS: Your efforts fixing it up are appreciated, but it's just way too late to add a new package at this point that might cause other packages to need modifications.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature