[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#680901: marked as done (nmu: rpy_1.0.3-21)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:34:46 +0100
with message-id <1343252086.495.35.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680901: Would have to be done in Testing now
has caused the Debian Bug report #680901,
regarding nmu: rpy_1.0.3-21
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

680901: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680901
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu rpy_1.0.3-21 . ALL . -m "rebuild against R 2.15.1"

>>> from rpy import *
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rpy.py", line 134, in <module>
    """ % RVERSION)
RuntimeError: No module named _rpy2151

      RPy module can not be imported. Please check if your rpy
      installation supports R 2.15.1. If you have multiple R versions

Rebuilding rpy in a clean sid chroot replaces

Only manual inspection of the file list seems to reveal the neccessity
of a rebuild. There is no dependency change.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 14:37 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> There's been a maintainer upload since this was filed, so the issue can either 
> be fixed by a binNMU of rpy in Testing or unblocking the maintainer upload from 
> Unstable.

I've just done the latter, so am closing this bug.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: