On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:23:36 +0200, Wilfried Gösgens wrote: > Hi Julien, > > yes you're probably right. > > running an 8.12 citserver with 8.13 will break citadel networking; I should > have added the new member to the end. > I believe that would also have been broken, as the struct is public, so libcitadel could read/write beyond a caller-allocated buffer. > citserver 8.13 will however refuse to compile with an older version. > > citadel networking is a rather rare usecase which you only do if you operate > a citadel federation network. > > So as long as there isn't 8.12 shipped with 8.13 intermixed I guess we can > take the risk. > I'm not willing to ignore this, sorry. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature