[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#668806: marked as done (nmu for xfce4-panel dependencies)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:48:08 +0200
with message-id <20120719084808.GQ7369@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#668806: Bug#668806: Bug#668806: Bits from the Release Team: Freeze approaching!
has caused the Debian Bug report #668806,
regarding nmu for xfce4-panel dependencies
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
668806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

Xfce 4.10 is around the corner, and like last time, we have some changes
in the panel which break the plugins built against the previous (4.8)
panel.

Like last time, we'd like to push a new 4.8 xfce4-panel with shlibs
like:

libxfce4panel-1.0 3 xfce4-panel (>= 4.7.7), xfce4-panel (<< 4.9)

then make a round of binNMUs for dependencies. So when it's time to
upload 4.10, we can safely upload in stable a 4.10 panel with shlibs:

libxfce4panel-1.0 4 xfce4-panel (>= 4.9.2)

or even

libxfce4panel-1.0 4 xfce4-panel (>= 4.9.2), xfce4-panel (<< 4.11)

and ask for a second round of binNMUs.

Since there are quite some plugins, I didn't yet upload the 4.8.6-4
xfce4-panel including the shlibs change, in case you'd like more info on
the whole transition. Ping me if/when I can upload.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Jul  1, 2012 at 22:30:51 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:

> (sorry, the --parallel was present at that time, I didn't bother to
> change it). I think binNMUs can be scheduled, then I'll transform this
> bug into an unblock request (but I'll do that at the end of the 10 days
> period anyway, there's no rush).
> 
The binNMUs are all in testing now.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: