[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#681605: marked as done (unblock: geoip/1.4.8+dfsg-4)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:29:29 +0200
with message-id <20120717192929.GR7369@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681605: unblock: geoip/1.4.8+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #681605,
regarding unblock: geoip/1.4.8+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

681605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681605
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package geoip

It adds multiarch support:

* Add multiarch support.
* Add lintian override for false positive hardening-no-fortify-functions
* Wrap all debian/control fields.

unblock geoip/1.4.8+dfsg-4

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 17:45:55 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

> Hello,
> Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org> (14/07/2012):
> > It adds multiarch support:
> > 
> > * Add multiarch support.
> that might be me, but it looks to me like that doesn't really match:
>  2. changes for release goals, if they are not invasive;
> in http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
> It looks to me like it's just too late for that, unless you have a
> very good reason.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: