Patrick Matthäi <email@example.com> (15/07/2012): > Am 15.07.2012 17:45, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > > that might be me, but it looks to me like that doesn't really match: > > 2. changes for release goals, if they are not invasive; > > > > in http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html > > Hum, multiarch is a release goal […] I think my reply pretty much made it clear I understood that part; that doesn't make your changes less invasive. > and I need an multiarched geoip for myself in Wheezy I'm not sure the personal needs of a single individual are going to convince us to forget about the freeze policy we have decided on. If you badly needed it, you should have done that before the freeze, not 10 days after. > > Ccosmetic changes really are *not* appreciated during freeze. > > Yeah sorry, but it shouldn't break anything :) That we don't know until we have reviewed them all, which is why they are not appreciated. Unless somebody else feels like reviewing this package, I'll personally go for “sorry, but no”. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature