Hello John, John Stamp <jstamp@users.sourceforge.net> (11/07/2012): > OK. Thank you. I've attached a debdiff that fixes #676104 without > extraneous changes. Does that look acceptable? much better, thanks. > > 1.9.2 really? > > Yes. Starting with version 1.9.2 ruby no longer includes '.' in its > $LOAD_PATH. But that version of ruby is in ruby1.9.1. I tried to > clarify that in the attached debdiff. Indeed, that clarifies. I wasn't aware ruby1.9.1 was 1.9.x, x>1. :) > > > + * Use source format 3.0 (quilt) > > > > Again, really not a good time. > > Until now, I haven't needed to patch the source. Using source format > 3.0 (quilt) seems better than modifying the Build-Depends and > debian/rules. Or would the latter still be preferable? Or you could just patch the source directly, which (as discussed in another unblock request earlier) isn't too nice for later maintenance. Let's say I'm not too unhappy with 3.0 (quilt), please upload your package to unstable and ping us when it's accepted. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature