Re: would it be possible to reinstantiate openmeeg and ants in wheezy?
any feedback would be welcome
Cheers,
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Hi Release Team,
> 2 packages of mine, primarily due to demanding resources for build (c++
> with heavy use of templating) and testing (I do prefer to do build-time
> testing and they use realistic data) always were somewhat
> problematic to be built across architectures; thus they were removed
> from wheezy (while in testing) whenever new FTBFS were detected. Both
> are highly specialized to the field of neuroimaging. Both are old
> versions (see below) but relatively popular as for a specialized
> software.
> ants
> ----
> Slightly updated snapshot version than then one in squeeze
> Fresh upstream version requires fresh ITK (in experimental)
> popcon ~100
> FTBFS atm on mips, mipsel, s390 imho due to insufficient resources
> and might be tricky to make them build reliably
> openmeeg
> --------
> The same upstream version as in squeeze -- minor additional patching (gcc 4.7) + enabled build time unittests
> Fresh upstream requires fresh libmat (in experimental)
> popcon ~200
> FTBFS atm on mips only, and could be resolved simply through
> disabling build time unittesting
> I wondered, than even if I manage to overcome FTBFS on those -- would
> they be allowed to come back to wheezy?
> Thanks in advance
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: